Next time turn up the aesthetically pleasing parameter.
-
-
-
That aesthetically pleasing dial would be a GREAT one to add! Now to figure out how to make that customizable to each person's aesthetic..
-
All right I figured it out. You just need to show each person a lot of designs and let them rate them as pleasing or not. Next use this data to train a DNN then feed designs through the DNN for a aesthetically pleasing score. QED
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Where can I find out more about evolving optimization in design?
-
Autodesk has been doing a lot of generative design work. Check out their gallery in San Francisco for examples in person
-
Thanks for telling me about that gallery. Really appreciate it..
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Generative design has always been impressive. What should we be optimizing for? Comfort, cost, weight, stiffness, appearance, stackability, stability, recyclability and hundreds more.... Certainly not a small list. And user selectable optimization criteria becomes critical.
-
Yes, it would be great to be able to optimize on all of these dimensions..
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
-
Thanks for sharing that - it's really great how the weight was saved..
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Stunning. Bill where were those images from?
-
I found those images on Google just looking for the search term "Generative Design.."
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yep though the precursors have been around for a while - simulation, math, science, automation and CAD. Also I’ve see
@autodesk and team as well as others have generative design tools for all Science not just furniture. The interfaces and parameters will get better with time. -
Yes, I think we're really going to see a revolution in this area in the coming years..
-
Totally think you’re right. I worked in this long ago as a research engineer. I applied generative design algorithms with LISP AI code in
@AutoCAD to greatly speed up full building models later tested in finite element earthquake simulations with Cray supercomputers in 1996.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Can it opt for comfy-ness?
-
That would be a great optimization dimension! Very clever..
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I'm not! Humans are better at designing for humans than software.
-
Not true. Ask someone who used Windows 3.1
-
I thought it was the best version actually. Win 95 is next best.
-
Good memories playing Ski Free when I was 7
-
so, so terrifying.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
