"It is an interesting story, but not one with lasting implications." You don't think this is important? That the President tried to obstruct justice, once again?
But this time the scenario is likely true and it is not impossible that Steve Bannon, fired from the White House, supplied the narrative to the anti/Trump press. It is an interesting story, but not one with lasting implications.https://twitter.com/BillOReilly/status/956895501286367233 …
-
-
-
That's an awful lot of moral gymnastics you had to do there Bill. Are you twisted?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
No lasting implications...that is until time has been served. Stop being an apologist for this guy.
#WorseThanNixon -
#WorseThanNixon is the Obama administration using a false dossier to get a FISA warrant to spy on an opposition canidate. - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
It erodes trust in what Trump says, as fact.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ooo more conspiracy fadder. As Silotzo said to Tom Hayden, "I'm not that cleva"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's interesting Bill. I didn't think of that. That's why you're Bill I guess.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Oh ya, and this is what you'd be saying if it was Obama. Lol you guys are lost.
-
Yea but it wasn’t Obama. Aside from the fact that he’s not president and that makes your point silly. Obama was a scandal-less president.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Idk i think we should impeach the president for exercising his thoughts and maybe even his right.
-
Best reply yet! No surprise here!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.