When it comes to the subject of abortion there is far too much talking, and not nearly enough thinking.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
That starts a trip down a slippery slope. Californians are facing a bill now forcing vaccinations, with a non-elected lay panel deciding which children can be excused for health reasons. Where do you draw the line and who decides where the line is?
End of conversation
-
-
-
"There is far too much talking and not enough thinking. So please read my column where I talk more"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
These people have parents who did not believe in abortion. Just think about that.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Those who justify abortion reject that belief ..." I would argue they DENY the belief, Bill.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And betrays babies
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I disagree. It’s medical science (not just Christian doctrine) that supports the proposition that life begins at conception. You can debate the “magnitude” of that early life, but not its existence.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“Christian doctrine says that upon conception, a soul enters the human cell mass & therefore it is human, a creation of God.” You can kill the body, but not the soul. You can throw the aborted fetus in the garbage or worse, but that tiny soul goes straight into the arms of God.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.