NO. We need to focus on our own regime change first.
Shouldn’t an important U.S. foreign policy goal of the next couple of decades be regime change in China?https://twitter.com/NAChristakis/status/1066023438563844096 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That would require leadership that holds a vision for what the world should become and how the US should lead. I don’t believe the American people have an appetite for US global leadership any longer
-
Time for Americans who feel that way and REJECT the notion that the country needs to be a superpower/an empire to be prosperous, safe, and respected to stand up and make yourselves heard loud and clear!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Because that’s worked well so far...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
how did that regime change in Iraq work out?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
oh ffs you have to be kidding
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
No. Regime change in China could easily (1) result in hundreds of millions of deaths and (2) lead to something worse (see eg Iraq). The goal might reasonably be gradual evolution of the Chinese regime towards something more open, tolerant, peaceful and resilient
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"...regime change in China?" The US truly has a piss-poor record in the category of regime change. Let's clean our own house first. 2018 midterms were a good start.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.