.@Twitter @jack this is not nearly good enough. In fact, it’s a joke. It’s downright insulting. I will ask you - and @Facebook - to give an explanation UNDER OATH to the Senate subcommittee I chair. These are potential violations of election law, and that’s a crimehttps://twitter.com/jack/status/1316528193621327876 …
-
-
Always fun when Republican lawmakers threaten private companies because they hurt their feelings. Welcome to the free market, dillweed!
35 replies 2 retweets 69 likes -
Replying to @Biggan4Congress @HawleyMO and
Lol....Free markets don't censor. So, which is it?
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @TINAP49084422 @HawleyMO and
A private company can censor in a free market. It’s their company, their rules.
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Biggan4Congress @TINAP49084422 and
You really have no idea how this works do you? Look up section 230. After you get someone to read it to you let us know if you understand what they did wrong.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JonParkerjr1 @TINAP49084422 and
I’m familiar with 230. Whether or not they are a publisher or a platform has been debated for some time now. In the meantime, you’re free to move to a platform that better suits you.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Biggan4Congress @TINAP49084422 and
Ever twitter is admitting now what they did was wrong. Once again have someone read it to you.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Dr. John Biggan Retweeted jack
Are you referring to this? Sounds like they are saying that they needed to do better about communicating why something was censored.https://twitter.com/jack/status/1316528193621327876 …
Dr. John Biggan added,
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
