29 U.S.C. § 157
"Moreover..." 
She really likes to say that.
Amy Coney Barrett personally explains why she should not be appointed to the Supreme Court at this time.pic.twitter.com/6lZvyYvNZT
-
-
-
Caught that too, huh?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Knowing these thugs,
#Barrett was probably threatened if she didn’t accept the nomination. - End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Politicians, and anyone associated with politicians in any way, do not speak the truth. What they do is speak what is currently popular. Then, a year later they speak what's popular at the time and it might be entirely different.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You can’t expect moral consistency from these people. For jurists like ACB, the yardstick of whether a thing is Constitutional is: “Does my party want this thing or does the other party want this thing? If A, Constitutional. If B, Unconstitutional.”
-
I’m sure that’s exactly what the founders had in mind
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
She is a a token. mr trump only put her in as a counter to Kamala Harris (who actually worked to get in). The only qualification that she has is that she will be loyal to mr trump
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@SenKamalaHarris@SenBooker Has she been asked about this???Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.