I tweeted about some ridiculous takes comparing male circumcision to the Holocaust back in July and there's still male anti-circumcision activists yelling at me about it, even though I'm on their fucking side (ban all medically unnecessary circumcisions)
-
-
What if it's a victim of the latterhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ggqa6CCTR-4 …
-
Yep, still super wrong. FGM is explicitly about removing the sexual agency of women. It is a full removal of the pleasure organ. Get the fuck out of here with this bullshit
-
FGM is not always done to damage to female sexuality (even if it invariably does) and can technically involve damage or removal of any part of the vagina. And no, it's not "full removal" of the "pleasure organ", the clitoris is extensively internal and embedded in the vagina.
-
Meaning it's exceptionally difficult to totally remove and no form of FGM on record has ever done that (not that partial clitoral removal isn't damaging/wrong.) It's cool you'll shout down even a victim of this with an image informed by anatomical illiteracy and propaganda.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.