On circumcision, 'intactivists' are just wrong - latimes http://www.latimes.com/la-oe-allen-anti-circumcision-activists-20120812,0,2269752.story … The notion that circumcision reduces a man's sexual sensitivity has little basis in fact. Obsession with penis is the issue of the men in movement & their sex life.
-
-
Replying to @DrChaya
Hi again. I was going to drop this, but since you are still tweeting about it
I just want to leave this right here. This page does a good job of summing of some of the anatomical point intactivists make regarding physical benefits of keeping foreskin:https://www.foregen.org/human_foreskin 4 replies . 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @crypto_spawn
On circumcision, 'intactivists' are just wrong - latimes http://latimes.com/la-oe-allen-an … The notion that circumcision reduces a man's sexual sensitivity has little basis in fact. Obsession with penis is the issue of the men in movement & their sex life.
2 replies . 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @DrChaya @crypto_spawn
https://circumcisionmovie.com does an excellent job pointing flaws in medical studies w respect to sensitivity, and it’s not wrong to see this as a human rights issue
3 replies . 5 retweets 26 likes -
Replying to @Blue_Suede_Shue @crypto_spawn
propaganda piece with no actual science. See slate article I posted.
8 replies . 0 retweets 2 likes
Slate? That's your idea of "actual science"? Maybe try an actual journalhttps://academic.oup.com/ije/article/40/5/1367/658163 …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.