There is one main argument against paedobaptism (infant baptism). And that is this: You don't have to do it. Nothing in Scripture mandates it, and there's not one example of it. Everyone must repent and be baptized. No one must baptize their children who have yet to repent.
-
-
-
The Apostles never made such a connection. God never hunted a person for not baptizing their kids in the NC.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
That’s because they all baptized them.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Chapter and verse please.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
You claimed that God never hunted a person for not baptizing their kids, but you never proved they didn’t baptize their kids. You beat the burden of proof.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
You’ll also note that God didn’t always strike down covenant breakers. The wilderness generation went for 40 years without the sign of covenant initiation.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
...And every one of them, by not being circumcised, had entirely broken the covenant and had to be cut off. Gen 17. As would their kids have been too if they hadn’t been. Point, sir: there is clearly not complete continuity between circumcision and water baptism in the NC.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.