With the greatest respect, the burden of proof is on those who make the positive claim that babies cannot be baptized. Nowhere does Scripture, nor the Didache (a manual for converts) forbid the practice, which certainly must have been an issue given the Baptism of households. :)
-
-
I understand that is the Baptist view. I used to be one. Do you understand the what the Reformed mean when we talk about baptism being a sign and seal? What we mean when we call it “initiation”?
-
Or covenant community.
-
It’s not possible for you to know who’s in the covt community in your view, right?
-
Dave,
@XpCoulson maybe wants to confirm or deny my answer(s) maybe. Stand by before throwing another steak. -
You would, of course, read that in context of the previous QAs on baptism. But you’re not wrong. (Sorry, I’m working).pic.twitter.com/9YzvW563sv
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
