Was there a minimum weight requirement?
-
-
-

. Definitely a gender one
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Where was Weight Watchers back then?
-
Fat represented prosperity.


End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Wait... aren't those 10 people?
-
(I mean, I know that it hasn't always been 9 and doesn't have to be 9, but why would it have been 10? Shouldn't it have to be an odd number? Was there a seat vacant at the time?)
-
Probably the clerk or something similar
-
This sounds correct.
-
Nope. In 1864 there were 10 Justices. Which later we're reduced to 8... And obviously returned to 9 again. But in 1864, there were 10!http://supremecourthistory.org/timeline_court_chase.html …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Interesting that there are more than 9 people in that photo.
-
Yep. It went from 9 to 10 to 8 and then 9 again.http://supremecourthistory.org/timeline_court_chase.html …
-
I'm thinking that the number 11, or even 13, sounds pretty good starting in 2021.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Wish I had the opportunity to party hard with those guys.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Which one is Roger Taney?
-
Taney retired a few years before this..the Chief Justice is Salmon P Chase who is sitting in the center..
-
Thanks !
-
Welcome
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Interesting. Thank you!
-
Welcome
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.