No. You can't.
-
-
Replying to @ThugaManLaForge @Bertie_222 and
I take it back. The FDA gave HCQ an emergency use authorization for covid and ID docs all over the country including in academic centers, were prescribing it and advocating for it. I think you should track them down and write them all and call them quacks. And call the FDA quacks
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @EdoajoEric @Bertie_222 and
What you're saying re:HCQ is the reason that some, including me, are recommending caution and a lack of lay interference in health matters. My mother, who is a GP, was a big advocate of HCQ and we had several arguments about it. But I didn't call her a quack because she's my mom.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @ThugaManLaForge @EdoajoEric and
I will call anyone else a quack. Just let me at em boss. But in seriousness, because I really think we reached a perfect understanding, Dr. Kory needs media training and if your organization doesn't have the resources for it DM me and I'll find someone to donate their time.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @ThugaManLaForge @EdoajoEric and
I called a few HCQ pushers quacks back in the day because they behaved like quacks. Vladimir Zelenko is one example. Didier Rauolt is another. They were quacks.
7 replies 2 retweets 17 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @ThugaManLaForge and
Correct. They were quacks. My part time job was explaining to people why hcq did not work for covid. I am seeing something very different in the ivermectin data. Not calling it a cure or a miracle. The data emerging seem to be lining up reproducibly, and deserves a good look.
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @EdoajoEric @gorskon and
Being lumped in with those guys is incredibly insulting to someone who has dedicated his life to the proper application of science to the bedside.
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @EdoajoEric @ThugaManLaForge and
Dr. Kory called
#Ivermectin a "wonder drug" and a "miracle drug" in his testimony before Sen. Johnson's committee, did he not? That's pretty quacky-sounding, and I will continue to say so. Because it is.8 replies 1 retweet 11 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @ThugaManLaForge and
Your disciples R now coming after me 1 by 1, each I effortlessly send on their way with their tails between their legs. The latest thinks a NNT with a 95% CI between 4 and 15 is "large" and this is "underpowered." It indicates we must treat between 4 and 15 pts to stop 1 death
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @EdoajoEric @ThugaManLaForge and
I have no “disciples.” However the choice of word to describe people who like reading my blog and Tweets *is* rather revealing to me. People who use religion-based terms to support bad science and attack criticism of bad science are often engaging in projection.
7 replies 4 retweets 19 likes
How very scientific of you. People who use metaphors are awful. Did you pick that up with your "antennae"? What were you projecting with that - cockroach or martian?
-
-
Replying to @Bertie_222 @gorskon and
Sorry, couldn't help myself. But do you disagree with Dr. Osgood's analysis?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.