Nuclear has to be at the frontlines of fighting climate change.
-
-
-
2025 is too late. irreversible damage will already have been done
-
Irreversible damage has already been done. Short answer we're too late, we can fix the future but we cant fix now. We should have started a decade or two ago for that. Yang is all for Geoengineering research please read
#YangsClimatePlanpic.twitter.com/L58o7rA9Qp
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Everyone: AHHHHHH Centrists: is avoiding extinction worth the inconvenience?
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thank you for this much needed discussion on the Climate Crisis despite the DNC rejecting a Climate debate, you Bernie prove day in and day out how a President should ALWAYS act.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
With
#YangsClimatePlan there is no middle ground. You are ignoring one crucial ingredient to going greener Bernie. Nuclear... It would create thousands more jobs and is better.pic.twitter.com/UTJ2V210Yb
-
Nuclear is a nightmare.
-
Its actually not, its a lot safer than what people realize. Theres a lot of propaganda surrounding it.http://nuclearconnect.org/know-nuclear/talking-nuclear/top-10-myths-about-nuclear-energy …
-
We need a clean zero emission energy source yes but not nuclear we have the technology why not a cold fusion energy source but anything is better than nuclear
-
Isn't Cold Fusion a Nuclear Reaction? Old Nuclear was bad but now its not, it's advanced further and is actually safer and cleaner then most other sources.pic.twitter.com/Xi6oqVAo7b
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks Bernie.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nina for VP!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Love this!
-
Thanks, really appreciate it!

End of conversation
New conversation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.