Why does Tad Devine (your chief strategist from the 2016 election) have emails on the evidence list in Mueller’s case against manafort?
-
-
-
Did you know that Tad Devine was the chief strategist for John Kerry? And worked on Al Gore's campaign? And did ads for numerous Democrats over the years? Are they all Russian operatives? Is it so odd that campaign managers from two presidential campaigns might exchange emails?
-
You know who is also listed in the Manafort indictment? The PODESTA GROUP, You know, the firm led by the brother of Clinton's campaign manager? The one with the long history of pro-Russia advocacy?http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/357884-podesta-group-is-one-of-the-companies-mentioned-in-manafort …
-
If I had a tinfoil hat as large as yours I might wonder how it was so easy for Russians to gain credentials to access John Podesta's emails or get into the cloud server and steal analytics. There are rumors it was an inside job. But of course, I don't wear tinfoil . . .
-
No tinfoil hat, and I know how it was so easy to get podestas emails. Phishing and lack of good info security are real problems and make it easy for hackers. The pics I included are from the evidence list in manafort’s case. His strategist is on them. I’m curious as to why.
-
What I'm saying is that there is a small world of campaign advisors and Tad Devine is well known and worked on many Dem campaigns. You're insinuating that Devine suddenly became a Russian asset, in order to smear Bernie Sanders. Slimy of you.
-
I will also clarify I don’t think Bernie is a secret Russian agent. What I *am* concerned about is whether his strategist was (knowingly or unknowingly) compromised in some way that made it easier to propagate Russian misinformation through the sanders campaign/target BS voters
-
the "Russian misinformation" consisted mostly of pushing mainstream articles, retweeting ppl like Joy Reid, and fomenting racial division. AND occurred after the primary. AND we aren't idiots. You really don't see that your CT suspicions come from a similar strategy?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Hey Bernie. I love how you sound just like our Jeremy! We’ve all had enough of the ‘privileged few’ as well! We are working with you and each other, it’s good to be on the same side and pushing for positive progress. We are the visionaries for radical change, we believe and hope!
-
You do realize that Bernie is one of those privileged ones right?
-
You do realise he’s a good man?

End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Coming from a 1 percenter
-
an approximate net worth of 800K does not put him in the 1%
-
Very Aproxx
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yep, like how the US recently rejecting a breastfeeding proposal at the UN because they don't want to upset the billions of dollars breast-milk alternative makers earn each yearhttps://twitter.com/WatchingHawks/status/1017840327263170560 …
2:20Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Ruthless domination and subjection from above"...... Are you $hitting me here? Yes, the working conditions in the US are on par with China, North Korea and Cuba. You know, the countries that actually impose your marxist based ideology onto people. Time to retire, Bernie.
-
There has never been a Marxist state. Ever. There have been plenty of state capitalist systems, like those mentioned, and if you’d like to bash them, I’ll whole heartedly join you. Actually read Das Kapital, the communist manifesto is just propaganda.
-
The > capitalist & FREE a country is, the better off its people are. States based on marxist IDEOLOGIES like China have adopted the positive aspects of capitalism & it only took 10's of millions of deaths to do so! Marx was a loser like so many proponents of his ideology are.
-
Until a certain point.https://voxeu.org/article/gdp-and-life-satisfaction-new-evidence …
-
If you can’t actually debate this issue rationally, then I’m sorry for even trying. BTW, that means that the basic underpinnings of neoclassical economics are incorrect.
-
Better off doesn't necessarily =being wealthier. It's easier to agree on what suffering is than what happiness is. I'm sure we can agree that less suffering is better than more suffering. What's the best measurement for which countries have more suffering? Less suffering?
-
No measurement is perfect. HDI is one of the better ones. What similarities are there between the countries with the highest HDI?Lowest? Let's not look towards implementing/replicating ideas prevalent in countries at the lowest end of the HDI table!
-
I will repeat, there has never been a Marxist state. I agree that we should avoid state capitalism (eg Leninism) at all costs. However, the most successful firms/communities/states are always based on cooperation, many do a good job of hiding it.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.