It is unethical to participate in an exercise that pretends basic rights can be conferred by majority indulgencehttp://bit.ly/2vQMo2o
-
-
How would a young loved-up Bernard have responded if someone told him he could just "wait a couple of years" before Lyle let him marry?
-
*thumbs-up emoticon*
-
Did I win an argument?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I beg you, do not underestimate the impact a loss will have on LGBTI mental health. Ppl will literally kill themselves if we lose this.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
maybe, maybe. but don't give Vile Lyle and the RWNJs a millimetre...aux armes !
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It is dehumanising. But, the less YES votes, the worse it is for LG psych. Please, don't call for a boycott. I'm begging you as a lesbian.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Just like the Greens won a brief delay to carbon pricing when they knocked back the CPRS in 2009
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm not concerned about a delay in legislation, I am concerned about LG welfare. If we have the survey, we need as many YES as possible.
-
No, it is psychologically damaging enough for LGas it ia, we need as many YES as we can get. A boycott won't do us any good.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.