ministers of crown attacking judges in a matter before it's determined weakens separation of powers
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
timing (not during case with Cth litigant) and fairness (not comments from judgment) the issue. Comments after judgment fine.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It was an attempt to influence judges who had not yet handed down a decision
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
More importantly what makes you believe they are being "Precious" ? Do you understand the difference between public scrutiny and contempt?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No one is above the law.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This has nothing to do with scrutiny, it's about abuse of power. If journos can't appreciate the difference they have no business reporting.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
and allegations without evidence that judges not abiding by oath are just reckless undermining of independent judiciary.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Federal Ministers in charge of defective departments should mind their fucking business and concentrate on their own job
#justsayingThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The flip side is an American style system of elected judges. If that's what you'd prefer, so be it. But it's a shit system.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If they haven't done anything wrong they got nothing to worry about, right? You can't just break laws you don't like , right?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's the second time I have seen a tweet from you attacking the Judges reaction, what makes you believe Judges have over reacted? 1/2
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Scrutiny or ill-thought-out one-liners tossed out by people taking advantage of being (unaccountably) news-worthy?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why can a journo or politician attack a judge or court when neither can defend itself? See why people don't trust journos?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There is a judicial cttee that will hear criticism of judges. Using political platform to do it is wrong given separation of powers.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
precious journos who don't like being held up to legal/judicial scrutiny should hop in the same boat.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
All about the timing. Way TOO SOON in this case. More about party talking points and narrative setting than feedback on justice issue.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes. Australian law and order is now interspersed with advocate judiciaries who view the law as an instrument of cultural and social change
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.