@BernardKeane
I believe you are libertarian & provax?
What do you think of anti-vax language of "choice" to justify their position?
-
-
Thanks for your feedback. I wanted to see where the ideas of "choice" may be misinterpreted by others.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So if there is strong evidence of harm for others or society, then the "choice" argument is no longer valid
-
no - you choice stops if you are going to harm someone else. you are imposing costs on them for free otherwise.
-
So if I understand correctly, choice stops if you harm others. But it doesn't apply to society
-
Or what is being forced on the individual even though it harms them. That sounds like sane logic!?!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.