really? I'm reading about innocent people having to go back through old records to prove they aren't cheats.
-
-
-
you've confused two differemt issues mate
-
my apologies
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@9NewsAUS Problem is Bernard, this govt's so incompetent no one will believe they're doing something sensible.#UlteriorMotive -
Yep. Their every move has been tainted by gaslit malign manipulations so they have burnt any credibility.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@9NewsAUS ... that will only happen when they work the top end of town as hard as they work the bottom#fiscalresponsibilityThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@9NewsAUS this gov suxThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
it's a shame they are also not making changes that would increase revenue. More palatable when pain is shared.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Party A tries to make sensible change, Party B shouts 'Fire!!'. Party B tries to make sensible change, guess what happens?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I dont see why people need to have amillion dollars in assets that they take to the grave instead of financing their retiremnt
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Then how do you explain this?https://www.greenleft.org.au/content/why-greens-were-wrong-support-pension-cuts …
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@9NewsAUS Agree. Pension is supposed to be a safety net not a God-given right.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
theft by government is always excused by nihilist commentators
-
"theft" when it's legal, & only reducing a level of government payment, not appropriating private assets?
@BernardKeane -
it is theft when an agreement is made and one party uses force to renege on it once they have obtained benefits
-
There is no 'agreement' per se. Just benefits advanced by a Govt to citizens. Nor is there 'force' in change.
@BernardKeane -
"benefits" were laws that were rescinded after commitments were made. Maybe "benefits" to wind shd be removed
-
Any law can be changed. Benefits are not automatically perpetual. Wealthy seniors are not martyrs.
@BernardKeane -
And raising 'wind' is an irrelevancy to this subject.
@BernardKeane
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
