@jillywillydoo It isn't about controlling what YOU do, it's about restraining those who exploit the vulnerable.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
the addictive & harmful properties of sugar are well known. The state should step in like with alcohol/tobacco @jillywillydoo
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
invalid argument. The state isn't stopping anyone from consuming sugar drinks - just taxing them. Money for health - simples.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@jillywillydoo clearly* the only options are to either deregulate everything or regulate everything :/
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@BernardKeane @jillywillydoo what about when those decisions have negative externalities eg health costs?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@jillywillydoo I rarely agree with your POV but this time you're on the money Bernard.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
so do you want tax reduced on cigarettes?All unhealthy products should be legal and taxed in proportion to the damage they do
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What a fine idea
@Polyquats The product providers pay the#sugartax to the value of the retail sale. Ingenious!!!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@jillywillydoo who needs a state when you've got all the buying power you'll ever need?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.