Cool - so put your accounts online & let's see who your donors are. ACL will be happy to do that surely?https://twitter.com/LyleShelton/status/746502352861954048 …
-
-
the US gets this right. Answer to that question is no. But a group like ACL or the Wilderness Society would not be same
-
confused by your inconsistency - why a double standard on donor transparency?
-
donations to election campaigns of parties (that may later be in power) directed at transparency to prevent quid pro quo 1/2
-
I mean it's fine if you take that view. But it remains a double standard, regardless.
-
easy to accuse me of a double standard for have a view in a difficult area while refusing to address any of my questions.
-
not sure how you don't have a double standard - your explanation seems to be, you just like the groups that benefit from it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I asked first, you think the Communist Party should have had to hand its membership lists to Menzies?
-
Your eccentric 50s example is irrelevant. anyone enjoying taxpayer subsidies should be transparent about their use of money.
-
still not answering, huh. Use any current radical or sometimes unpopular group. Pick one you like.
-
no, you just don't like my answer to a bizarre, strained question. nor have you explained your double standard.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.