Cool - so put your accounts online & let's see who your donors are. ACL will be happy to do that surely?https://twitter.com/LyleShelton/status/746502352861954048 …
-
-
basic accountability ≠ complete member/donor lists. unless you think the state should know every dissident
-
you think the NAACP should have hand to hand every member's name to Alabama? Aus Communist party send all details to Menzies?
-
you think large corporations should be allowed to anonymously donate to political parties? same argument.
-
the US gets this right. Answer to that question is no. But a group like ACL or the Wilderness Society would not be same
-
confused by your inconsistency - why a double standard on donor transparency?
-
donations to election campaigns of parties (that may later be in power) directed at transparency to prevent quid pro quo 1/2
-
I mean it's fine if you take that view. But it remains a double standard, regardless.
-
easy to accuse me of a double standard for have a view in a difficult area while refusing to address any of my questions.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.