@crikey_news 0 alcohol group usually an odd combo of previous heavy drinkers, very unwell people and lifetime teetotalers.
-
-
-
perhaps you should go read the studies before trying to explain away the results.
-
Here's a meta-analysis which directly looks at the abstainer bias and study quality issue http://www.jsad.com/doi/abs/10.15288/jsad.2016.77.185 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
in moderation I don't think any one doubts that it is good for you do they? Bit misleading there Bernard.
-
wrong. read the article.
-
I did. Article suggests moderate drinking is good for you . Exactly what I said .
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If you want causal inference about 0 vs moderate alcohol you need longitudinal drinking info, which very few studies have.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
WOOOO HOOO !
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Whoever supports your case is exciting new evidence, whoever doesn't is (yawn) 'nanny statist' regardless of expertise
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
excellent piece. V concerned about focus on FAS too. Tiny population effected. Dominated by social issues.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
'Moderate' key word here. Most ppl significantly overestimate what moderate quantity means & aren't 'moderate' drinkers at all
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.