I have concluded a formal review into a recent SMH column which contained serious errors. Statement follows:http://www.smh.com.au/comment/statement-from-the-editorinchief-20160304-gnapxm.html …
-
-
@BernardKeane@sirgooddarren I'm ok with not immediately sacking/standing aside Sheehan but why was the revised article online for so long?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.