@BernardKeane there's an article on American Thinker about the homosexual dreamscapes of that film if u wanna waste more time.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@BernardKeane why did you?#srslyThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@BernardKeane It's the cinema..and there is cinematic licence.. should've just went with it -
@_A0K@BernardKeane Was it based on the book? There are always vitalm problems. Short stories are easier to script, and less errors, too. -
@jackinbocks2015@BernardKeane No doubt All I was saying is sometimes, because it's fiction, it's okay for inconsistencies to arise -
@_A0K@BernardKeane Sometimes there are glaring anomalies. I recall in Catch 22 a major character gets a name change. -
@jackinbocks2015 Sometimes characters are amalgamated in films too. Should films be a faithful adaptation of a book? -
@_A0K I think so. Clearly it doesn't bother non-readers Those who read the book expect to see certain things depicted Some changes irk. -
@jackinbocks2015 I accept we value differently and that film is different medium - sight v imagination - so I can 'excuse' changes. -
@_A0K If you ever get to make a film, I strongly recommend using a short story. That way, you can embellish the script to your delight. - 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@BernardKeane rage is on , shut upThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.