@BernardKeane ftr, UNWAG decision isn't legally binding & your argument re UK/Sweden participation in process could be made 100 times over
@profsarahj where did I say it WAS legally binding, sorry?
-
-
@BernardKeane you say UNHRO says it is legally binding, which I interpreted you as agreeing with. Sorry if I interpreted you wrong -
@profsarahj no I didn't say it was legally binding, I noted the WG claimed it was, but might have trouble enforcing it -
@BernardKeane yes fair enough. As I said, I interpreted that as you agreeing it was legally binding. Anyway, IMO it's not legally binding
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@BernardKeane the UNHRO statement is weird doublespeak. I guess it is 'indirectly' legally binding, but that's actually 'not' bindingThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.