.@SenatorSurfer you've perpetuated rotten policy for a vague commitment to an inquiry. I bet the richlisters are quaking in their boots.
-
-
Replying to @BernardKeane
@BernardKeane So you are sure that the legislation would have gotten through today without a compromise?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MeganLynnAndrew
@MeganLynnAndrew until today the government was faced with an impasse. now the Greens have ushered them through for nothing.1 reply 2 retweets 2 likes -
-
Replying to @MeganLynnAndrew
@MeganLynnAndrew on the contrary, the government's only way forward was to accept the Bradbury changes... until the Greens caved in1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BernardKeane
@BernardKeane It was hardly caving. It's a compromise, and it's definitely an improvement on nothing, & better than the risk of more nothing1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MeganLynnAndrew
@MeganLynnAndrew errr, no, because the Coalition didn't have the option of sticking with nothing1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BernardKeane
@BernardKeane Why? How do you know that? <--genuine question.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MeganLynnAndrew
@MeganLynnAndrew because the bill it was attached to was politically necessary for the government2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
@garymlord @MeganLynnAndrew no. Greens were justified in not voting for the CPRS. bad policy.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.