.@SenatorSurfer you've perpetuated rotten policy for a vague commitment to an inquiry. I bet the richlisters are quaking in their boots.
-
-
Replying to @BernardKeane
@BernardKeane So you are sure that the legislation would have gotten through today without a compromise?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MeganLynnAndrew
@MeganLynnAndrew until today the government was faced with an impasse. now the Greens have ushered them through for nothing.1 reply 2 retweets 2 likes -
-
Replying to @MeganLynnAndrew
@MeganLynnAndrew on the contrary, the government's only way forward was to accept the Bradbury changes... until the Greens caved in1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BernardKeane
@BernardKeane It was hardly caving. It's a compromise, and it's definitely an improvement on nothing, & better than the risk of more nothing1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MeganLynnAndrew
@MeganLynnAndrew errr, no, because the Coalition didn't have the option of sticking with nothing1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BernardKeane
@BernardKeane Why? How do you know that? <--genuine question.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MeganLynnAndrew
@MeganLynnAndrew because the bill it was attached to was politically necessary for the government2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BernardKeane
@BernardKeane Why? Hardly anything seems politically necessary for them anymore if you believe the polls...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@MeganLynnAndrew 51-49? That was Essential this week
-
-
Replying to @BernardKeane
@BernardKeane Hmm. That is interesting. Still, I'm not convinced the LNP would have agreed to $200m threshold. Good chat though.0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.