@BernardKeane Maybe true, but a non sequitur scientifically
-
-
-
@cosmicpinot most good one-liners are scientific non-sequiturs I imagine... -
@BernardKeane that is probably true
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@BernardKeane what is the Gundersen piece? -
@AnthonyLanglois see my RT of Quiggin - End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@BernardKeane@glynmoody such bollocks. Coal oil & gas waste poisons air, water and soil. Nuclear complements solar/wind for baseload. -
@kevinmarks@BernardKeane but the issue was renewables vs nuclear, not fossil fuels vs nuclear... -
@glynmoody@BernardKeane which is a false dichotomy. Fossil is the problem, nuclear, solar, hydro and wind are solutions. Batteries help. -
@kevinmarks@glynmoody@BernardKeane agree, but to be fair, nuclear and hydro both have a fair share of environmental issues as well. -
@rasmusvuori@glynmoody@BernardKeane compared to oil/gas/coal they are tiny. Coal waste is more radioactive http://epeus.blogspot.com/2002/04/ban-hazardous-coal-power-now-us.html … -
@kevinmarks@rasmusvuori@BernardKeane another thing we haven't started thinking about much yet is environmental cost of all that lithium... -
@glynmoody@kevinmarks@BernardKeane at what efficiency could lithium be recycled from old batteries? -
@rasmusvuori@kevinmarks@BernardKeane no idea, but I imagine it will become quite a good business soon...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@BernardKeane@Vikkik88 the "hundreds of thousands of years" is bollocks and you should know better. 1/2 -
@rgmerk @ActinideAge@BernardKeane@Vikkik88 and the solar waste doesn't decay away ever. How can we handle that FOREVER? All the fluorine? -
@rgmerk @ActinideAge@BernardKeane@Vikkik88 the horrors that humans have exposed the planet to
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@BernardKeane@KirstyWho Nuk power meltdown dangerous. But don't have to store waste for mill years. Wen tech develops can send waste 2 Sun. -
@HEX_____@BernardKeane@KirstyWho world isn’t rich enough for this. -
@mavetju@BernardKeane@KirstyWho Wen technology develops sending nuclear waste to the sun will be cheap as air travel. -
@HEX_____@mavetju@BernardKeane I'm sure you're right. But surely the tech to store solar power is closer, simpler, cleaner and cheaper... -
@KirstyWho@mavetju@BernardKeane Yea. Agree. But we produce Nuclear waste from medical etc. Just the million year waste argument not true.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.