That $400m data retention figure Abbott pulled out of his backside would mean a surveillance tax of $54 a year for every household.
-
-
Replying to @BernardKeane
@BernardKeane I still don’t understand the point. Evidence fro O/S shows it will do nothing to prevent crime. Why do they want it?5 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.