I was told that questioning the outcome of an election was treason.
-
-
-
OMG, they're trying to murder
@aoc!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Really bad headline. I will read the article but in this case there is no claim of fraud or crazy conspiracy - just that there was human error disqualifying 22 ballots that should have been counted. Count ALL the votes - might not change it
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Read the article. The court of public opinion appears to be Faux News viewers and the Republican base. You mention effect on independent voters but no independent voices cited. Enjoy your writing but this is dissapointing.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is bizarre framing. 6 votes and Hart is following the law. just because GOP hypocrites are whining about it and calling it “stealing” doesn’t make it so.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Do you mean 'has been asking that 22 legally cast ballots be counted since before MMM was provisionally seates pending the outcome?' Because what Rita Hart is doing is legal. She's following the appropriate process, and the GOP propaganda machine knows it.
-
She has not followed the process - she should have gone to court for a third review of the vote (both prior rechecks done by bipartisan teams), not gone to Pelosi.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I think it is safe to say she isn’t just accused of trying to overturn an election. She is without any doubt trying to overturn an election.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
6 votes versus 80,000 thousand votes difference.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.