Tweetovi
- Tweetovi, trenutna stranica.
- Tweetovi i odgovori
- Medijski sadržaj
Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @BenceBago
Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @BenceBago
-
Bence Bago proslijedio/la je Tweet
I need your help, Twitter. I can't access an APA paper that *I am an author on*: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2020-00479-001?doi=1 … Doesn't seem to come up on sci-hub. Don't have institutional access (as far as I can tell). Can't email the author (that's me).


Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Bence Bago proslijedio/la je Tweet
Two weeks left to submit individual abstracts to the 2020 International Conference on Thinking, in Paris, this summer! Don't miss out on this one, it's going to be legendary and you'll forever regret not attending https://www.ict-2020.eu/#section-welcome …pic.twitter.com/F0xyJL5IkH
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Bence Bago proslijedio/la je Tweet
There is no universal consensus on how to conduct and report Bayesian analyses.
@BalazsAczel & colleagues present their views on the debate in a Comment, providing a thinking guideline for scientists wishing to employ Bayesian inference in their researchhttps://buff.ly/3aMi8a6Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Bence Bago proslijedio/la je Tweet
Now accepted in principle at Nature Human Behaviour: "Moral thinking across the world: Exploring the influence of personal force and intention in moral dilemma judgments." Great work team! More info on next steps coming soon
https://psyarxiv.com/9uaqm/ Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Bence Bago proslijedio/la je Tweet
Yay! On to data collection for this one!!
Many, many thanks to @BenceBago &@BalazsAczel
https://twitter.com/PsySciAcc/status/1222935143444373507 …Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Bence Bago proslijedio/la je Tweet
This time it IS out! Not Born Yesterday, arguing that people aren’t gullible. Psychology! Political science! History! Anthropology! Media studies! ToC below, and threads to follow with stuff I wish I’d put in the book https://sites.google.com/site/hugomercier/not-born-yesterday …https://twitter.com/PascalBoyerUSA/status/1206623344931606528 …
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Bence Bago proslijedio/la je Tweet
Expert panel discussion on how to conduct Bayesian inference is just out at
@NatureHumBehav https://rdcu.be/b0O0y With@RinkHoekstra@StatModeling@EJWagenmakers I. Klugkist@JeffRouder@VandekerckhoveJ@mdlBayes@richarddmorey@wolfvanpaemel Z. Dienes@DonVanRavenPrikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Implications: Analytic thinking is good!! ⇒Interventions that promote critical thinking should be expected to improve accuracy, not increase bias. ⇒Social media design, which encourages fast scrolling and not careful thinking, may exacerbate success of fake news
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
People higher on cognitive reflective abilities were also more likely to engage in deliberation and correct their erroneous intuitive response.
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Then we turned to political headlines... Results were the same! Deliberation increased accuracy, regardless of political consistency. And no effect on partisan differences.
Classical dual-process theory
Motivated System 2 Reasoningpic.twitter.com/rwQ8mnQ62Y
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
First we tried non-political headlines, where there's no role for partisan motivated reasoning. As expected, belief in false headlines was higher in initial (intuitive) responses than final (deliberative) responses or control ("one response baseline"). Deliberation⇒accuracypic.twitter.com/4amlndqaO1
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
But correlation ≠ causation!
So we manipulated level of deliberation when assessing news headlines
Subjects gave intuitive response under time pressure+cognitive load. Then headline was presented again without deliberation constraint.
Control=1 rating with no constraintPrikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Prior correlational evidence supports the classical account: People who are more deliberative are less likely to believe false headlines, regardless of partisan consistency. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S001002771830163X …pic.twitter.com/QDF85AkPLj
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Classical Dual-Process Theory suggests that deliberation helps people correct flawed intuitive responses - and thus increases accuracy. Prediction: Deliberation decreases belief in false headlines relative to true headlines.pic.twitter.com/65LiB8Tf7l
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Motivated System 2 Reasoning suggests deliberation is used to protect one’s identity – and thus that reasoning is held hostage by partisanship. Prediction: Deliberation increases belief in politically consistent headlines relative to politically inconsistent headlines.pic.twitter.com/5c7VfRXjUT
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
We tested predictions of two major contrasting theories about the role of deliberation in information processing: Motivated System 2 Reasoning (MS2R) vs Classical dual-process theory
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
New JEP:G paper w
@DG_Rand@GordPennycook Fake news, fast and slow: Deliberation reduces belief in false (but not true) news headlines https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2020-00479-001?doi=1 … Preprint https://psyarxiv.com/29b4j First *causal* evidence that analytic thinking increases accuracy, not partisan bias!pic.twitter.com/6N7HAr0TiH
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Bence Bago proslijedio/la je Tweet
“New” work (accepted 2018, published 2020!) with
@BenceBago in the latest Thinking and Reasoning issue. We tested predictions of the revised dual-process model that we and others have been developing https://bit.ly/2RGdyl0 postprint: https://bit.ly/37es9uJHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Bence Bago proslijedio/la je Tweet
Sits neatly with recent pubs (ft.
@wimdeneys,@mbialek82,@BenceBago,@jonbaron1944, et al.) challenging the traditional dual-process model of moral cognition (e.g., http://www.wdeneys.org/data/jdm%20reprint.pdf …) It seems that our utilitarian impulses are as intuitive as the deontological ones!https://twitter.com/DegenRolf/status/1187348322228588544 …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Bence Bago proslijedio/la je Tweet
A new study from
@DG_Rand,@GordPennycook &@BenceBago found that people are more likely to fall for false headlines if they spend less time thinking about themhttps://psyarxiv.com/29b4jHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.