1/ Did you know that Vannevar Bush (you know, the guy who helped enable everything from radar to the manhattan project, the NSF to memexes) wrote an autobiography? Turns out that yes he did, it's been out of print since the 70's, and it's *excellent* BOOK REPORT THREAD
-
-
5/ More meta - "yes, I realize there are a bajillion books on the Making of the Atomic Bomb and the Radar* so I will skip those" *I recommend The Making of the Atomic Bomb and Tuxedo Park if you are interestedpic.twitter.com/1i5v0eZwvu
Prikaži ovu nit -
6/ What *is* dated is his oft-repeated concerns about overpopulation. It's a wonderful reminder of how many things we thought would bring about the end of civilization that are now (arguably) non-issues.pic.twitter.com/5EKKWiUJmw
Prikaži ovu nit -
7/ It's also fascinating which breakthroughs he thought were just around the corner, and which were not even on his radar. Why did he think general antivirals were imminent? Why weren't they? (Would certainly be nice to have right now)pic.twitter.com/0l6xOwZMiS
Prikaži ovu nit -
8/ Individuals making the difference between success and failure of critical technologies and programs is a huge theme.pic.twitter.com/BU10OJzTwB
Prikaži ovu nit -
9/ Specifically, he repeats the theme of innovations only happening because individuals went against the system. Which raises the uncomfortable question - in order to get more amazing sci-fi shit, how do you systematize going against the system?pic.twitter.com/lpnYCWW5Bg
Prikaži ovu nit -
10/ Tons of detail about how they structured organizations like the NRDC and *why* Feels like he's basically giving blueprints for people who want to follow that are easy to understand and hard to execute.pic.twitter.com/lnvAth0kTY
Prikaži ovu nit -
11/ He describes the *massive* shift in how science and research was done in the US during WWII. This is where our modern system was born - both the good parts and bad.pic.twitter.com/gvkr8gM1BT
Prikaži ovu nit -
12/ Today, university administration is basically bloatware. But it actually started as a valuable labor aggregator so researchers could focus on research.pic.twitter.com/LreSR9HTUQ
Prikaži ovu nit -
13/ This is the moment that Universities began to depend on federal research dollars. I think this started as a good thing, but the relationship has metastasized.pic.twitter.com/OpJuhFsnCr
Prikaži ovu nit -
-
-
16/ They could review a project in a week and get work started on it *the next day.* More fodder for
@patrickc 's https://patrickcollison.com/fast pic.twitter.com/NUcojhHsrF
Prikaži ovu nit -
17/ Bush earns his reputation as the person who can go between Military/Government, Academia, and Industry. He gets both how the structures of each of them make sense in their own context, but then clash when they interface.pic.twitter.com/LyrluRGsPy
Prikaži ovu nit -
-
19/ Trust in lines of communication is underrated as a goal to strive for.pic.twitter.com/Pma21zfbpj
Prikaži ovu nit -
20/ The consequences of these organizational structures today - NASA changes it's goals every 4 or 8 years ...pic.twitter.com/GzmqFiFisW
Prikaži ovu nit -
21/ I'm still not sure if Bush or Jewett was right ... Deserves more digging!pic.twitter.com/mFajpWsuHJ
Prikaži ovu nit -
22/ Many of the stories emphasize
@SafiBahcall's point in Loonshots about the need to manage the transfer of technology from the people who create it to the people who use it. Also hi Millikan! I love how random science heroes just drop into the story.pic.twitter.com/3iyT2WPoT6
Prikaži ovu nit -
-
24/ Committees can actually be good: when there are two groups who think very differently but have a common goal.pic.twitter.com/b0p15cyQTy
Prikaži ovu nit -
25/ Made me think a lot about the value of coordinating efforts vs. letting a thousand flowers bloom. Where I came down is that you should absolutely have parallel efforts but there is an optimum amount of coordination that isn't zero. Were that optimum lies an open questionpic.twitter.com/n6RoKMsebI
Prikaži ovu nit -
26/ War may be one of the few situations where *massive* numbers of people all have a real stake in the outcome.pic.twitter.com/iuOIJg3XWB
Prikaži ovu nit -
27/ Innovations appearing outside the organizations which find them useful is still a huge problem today.pic.twitter.com/QIDhROCAVt
Prikaži ovu nit -
-
29/ There are so many things that fall into this category: the concept is straightforward so it's not 'novel' but it takes a ton of R&D and grinding to even get it to the point of a proof of concept.pic.twitter.com/LOaVmCF08K
Prikaži ovu nit -
30/ I think Bush was a truly kind person. This is the story of what he did for civilians who kept sending him ideas for inventions they thought were desperately important to the war effort.pic.twitter.com/cnAOFPNhZE
Prikaži ovu nit -
31/ The duality of command - sometimes commanders need to be obeyed no questions asked, and sometimes they need to be challenged. I love the idea of having a literal physical signal for it. Apparently businesspeople used to use their ties for this too. We've lost these signalspic.twitter.com/TaosaS7Dat
Prikaži ovu nit -
32/ I feel like we don't talk about inventing things anymore. We have entrepreneurs, hackers, researchers ... but nobody is an inventor.pic.twitter.com/EsLEKX9EFH
Prikaži ovu nit -
-
34/ A sobering analysis of why large companies with a single major product have no incentive to incorporate an improvement (even a large one) to a single part of that product.pic.twitter.com/ThQnWOGBsd
Prikaži ovu nit - Još 22 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.
