One way to dream up post-book media to make reading more effective and meaningful is to systematize "expert" practices (e.g. How to Read a Book), so more people can do them, more reliably and more cheaply. But… the most erudite people I know don't actually do those things!
-
-
I'm amenable to that argument for things like engineering practices: great engineers automatically do something like Hoare-triple analysis automatically. But erudite readers I know are doing something *way* less complicated than an approximation of Adler's analytical reading.
-
Hypothesis: the more 'natural' the skill, the less systematized the experts look. Again, I'll draw on physical skills: some people are ripped without thinking about what they eat at all or can do backflips on the first try. They never used a system. OtoH us mortals ...
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.