Ben Van Calster

@BenVanCalster

Medical statistician, associate professor KU Leuven and LUMC Leiden

Leuven, Belgium
Vrijeme pridruživanja: srpanj 2018.
15 fotografija ili videozapisa Fotografije i videozapisi

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @BenVanCalster

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @BenVanCalster

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    6. ožu 2019.

    It does not contain a single p-value 🥳

    1 reply 9 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. velj
    Odgovor korisnicima i sljedećem broju korisnika:

    Unfortunately this document contains several statistical misconceptions and will perpetuate invalid responder analysis using change from baseline

    1 reply 4 proslijeđena tweeta 10 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    26. sij

    Reviewed a paper yesterday, using Machine Learning to predict athletic performance . Personally felt regression would have improved the results/interpretability. ML has its place, but not everything is better with ML. Makes me think of this paper.

    1 reply 3 proslijeđena tweeta 14 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  4. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    25. sij

    Dr. Woodcock at FDA coined the term SCT (small, crappy trials) to characterize many of the trials done in academic centers--too small to answer meaningful questions, many with poor designs & no analysis plan. These SCTs often aren't finished & aren't published.

    5 replies 25 proslijeđenih tweetova 64 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  5. 22. sij

    In my view, a great editorial from Nature Human Behaviour. When you report on your research, "tell it like it is" and report transparently! This is closely related to reporting guidelines (e.g. ) and spin.

    1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 5 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  6. 21. sij

    I like this statement.

    This. I refuse to read prediction rule papers that do not include a decision curve analysis
    1 proslijeđeni tweet 6 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  7. 21. sij

    MEMTAB abstract deadline extended to 7 Feb! Confirmed keynote/invited speakers: Scientific Committee: , , , Yemisi Takwoingi, Lotty Hooft, , , , .

    By popular demand: abstract deadline extended to Friday 7th Feb! Get your abstract in now for
    8 proslijeđenih tweetova 12 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    20. sij

    New paper with and Nora Falconieri, open access.

    11 proslijeđenih tweetova 27 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  9. 17. sij

    Apparently, lack of information was the most frequent critique. This is consistent with our own systematic review.

    Top 10 Reviewer Critiques of (AI) Articles: Qualitative Thematic Analysis of Reviewer Critiques of / Manuscripts Submitted to JMRI
    1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 6 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  10. 17. sij

    MEMTAB2020 in Leuven (2-3 July): abstract deadline is approaching. Spread the word and submit your abstract now! Keynote talk by !

    6 proslijeđenih tweetova 11 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    16. sij
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    As a clinician, my personal feeling is that a rigorous statistician IS GOLD. I’m sorry you don’t feel that from everyone :(

    1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 9 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  12. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    16. sij

    My career so far: 1⃣I want to use advanced methods to answer questions I'm interested in 2⃣I want to use "simple" methods to answer questions others are interested in 3⃣I want to help other people correctly use simple methods... 4⃣I just want people to enter their data correctly

    20 replies 90 proslijeđenih tweetova 807 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    15. sij

    Women risk experiencing symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder following a miscarriage or ectopic pregnancy, according to a new study by and , reports.

    6 proslijeđenih tweetova 15 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    14. sij

    Today, we had our first class of "Critical Thinking: Exploring the Science behind the News". This is why our class matters. We opened with this jaw-dropping example. Without reading further: how did the researchers study this? What is the science behind the news? 1/ (corrected)

    Korisnici , i
    20 replies 263 proslijeđena tweeta 589 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    11. sij
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    Indeed. Unsurprising and consistent with this SR: . But where is the anger of Twitter that the SR authors faced for the “false” comparison between machine learning and logistic regression?

    6 proslijeđenih tweetova 15 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  16. 10. sij

    6 proslijeđenih tweetova 9 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  17. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    9. sij

    A 66yr old lady from Suffolk, has recently noticed a firm breast lump & is worried it might be cancer. She's heard her local MP , singing the praises of , so turns to their Chatbot for advice... This Babylon triage is utterly absurd👇

    90 replies 376 proslijeđenih tweetova 419 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  18. 9. sij

    45 years ago, Robert Wherry wrote "Underprediction from overfitting: 45 years of shrinkage". He included a self-written poem, which still makes sense today (although we would perhaps choose a different title nowadays). (Personnel Psychology 1975;28:1-18)

    5 replies 35 proslijeđenih tweetova 83 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  19. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    4. sij

    Fantastic new paper on calibration of predictions by out of the STRATOS initiative:

    5 replies 60 proslijeđenih tweetova 185 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  20. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    2. sij

    The Google AI mammogram paper is FLAWED. Want to learn why? AND why cancer screening is the LAST thing you should pick FIRST to work on with AI? Read this This is educational, I promise

    1.555 proslijeđenih tweetova 3.361 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  21. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. sij
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    How can we be confident it works if independent evaluation is not possible let alone issues of reproducibility ()

    3 proslijeđena tweeta 22 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi

@BenVanCalster još nije objavio nijedan Tweet.

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·