Benjamin Soskis

@BenSoskis

Historian of philanthropy, Philly sports fan, devotee of the Pogues. Co-editor of , researcher. Tweets rep no one's views but my own.

Vrijeme pridruživanja: svibanj 2017.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @BenSoskis

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @BenSoskis

  1. Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    BREAKING: Philadelphia police have cleared after investigating an alleged physical assault between the mascot and a 13-year-old boy.

    Poništi
  3. prije 11 sati

    Welcome to Center on Nonprofits and Philanthropy. Excited to have you here!

    Poništi
  4. prije 24 sata

    You deserve this one, Andy. Time’s yours.

    Poništi
  5. 3. velj

    A really important point that becomes painfully clear during SB commercials. It’s imposs to put actual figure on it, but seeing that vet hospital commercial sandwiched btw others meant to tug at heartstrings makes clear how cause marketing saps promotional power of trad charities

    Poništi
  6. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    3. velj

    It would not take that much imagination or leadership for 20 of our largest foundations to get together, put $1 million each into a pool, & run four ads on the SuperBowl about the importance of the nonprofit sector in America.We should work toward this for next year. I’m serious.

    Poništi
  7. 3. velj

    A medical research charity super bowl ad? Is that normal?

    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    In America every social media platform eventually devolves into people begging for help with medical bills

    Poništi
  9. Poništi
  10. 1. velj
    Poništi
  11. 31. sij

    HUC's American Jewish Archives to house JFNA's multi-million Document Collection - eJewish Philanthropy via @

    Poništi
  12. 31. sij

    One of the most interesting developments for me in studying is the deepening associations btw the urgency brought w a racial justice lens and rapid response grant making and/or limited life philanthropy.

    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    31. sij

    I say this as supporter of student debt cancellation (on the Warren model): This is above all a money-in-politics story. It's about how smart donors can shape the agenda through candidates and think tanks (incl 2 that I've worked for.) Influence of money is complex and pervasive.

    Poništi
  14. 31. sij

    More evidence (along w Zinsmeister op-eds) that there are considerable divides w/in conservative philanthro-sphere abt how seriously to take the decline in giving rates & whether it merits turn to tax policy to reverse the trend. The ACR is a project of .

    Poništi
  15. 30. sij

    These results suggests a relationship btw (lack of) transparency and trust in nonprofit institutions that's quite different from the one conventionally assumed.

    Poništi
  16. 30. sij

    Independent Sector asked the top presidential candidates of both major political parties to fill out a questionnaire about their policies affecting nonprofits. Only Klobuchar, Buttigieg, Yang responded.

    Poništi
  17. 30. sij

    6: I think this reflects a deeper ambivalence among conservatives in terms of how seriously they take declining donor base as major issue, bc it so clearly touches on economic reforms that they're loath to engage w/.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. 30. sij

    5: So, at some level, he's concerned abt declining giving rates (if not abt % of giving coming from small/medium scale donors). But he doesnt connect that decline to econ crisis of last decade, which are exactly what fueled this surge of critique of plutes & their philanthropy.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. 30. sij

    4: It's still unclear whether Zinsmeister thinks decline of small-scale giving & eroding donor base is a big deal. OOH, he seems to suggest critics are focusing too much attn on elite giving. But on other, he suggests that this critique might be responsible for that erosion.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. 30. sij

    3: Those might be accurate (tho recent report from Wealth-X has much higher figures), but they exclude $ given through foundations, so aren't perfect barometer of status of HNWI & charitable giving. I'd like to see more on how he came to the figures, tho. More importantly...

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·