if they automate the passthru of the financial support with an ETH-style digital "smart" contract then the use-case for blockchain is valid. the other issue is that a DB is permissioned, records can be altered. Data stored on-chain is by definition immutable. 2nd use-case.
Because there's no way you could do that with a fucking database. Jesus.https://twitter.com/WIRED/status/1220474879557980160 …
-
-
-
You need a smart contract to specify the bank account of the recipient? Are you serious? Also, Merkle trees.
- Još 4 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
But how could you verify that no-one falsified the records if you just used a database? Cryptographic proof in these matters is vital. Essential. Existential, even. -----BEGIN PG
-
a) Merkle trees. b) So, you're going to validate the origin of your coffee, and the payment path to the grower?
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
"blockchains" get funded. "Databases" don't.
-
Databases don't waste time and lose money.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
But why solve a problem with the energy footprint of a raspberry pi when you could use an entire data center?
-
-
-
It is a database ;)
-
-
-
-
This is the only acceptable reaction to 90% of exhibitor booths at a blockchain conference
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.