it’s a good piece, but a software example would be more useful than a hardware one. It depends on the question as to whether your “fine” is actually “fine”. Putting a burden of proof on someone who can never satisfy that burden is not a new trick, which your model risks
-
-
-
I am not putting any burden of proof on anyone. I am setting limits on the best you can expect to do.
- Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
If you want to be regulated and subject to censorship by a centralised but verifiable party, then fine, that is your right. Some of us don't because we are not subjected to the same world experiences as you, and is our right to take that risk, without infringing on your rights.
-
(And yes, that includes not infringing on your right to live in a world where the shared air we breath is not full of smoke thanks to climate change, before you ask.)
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
This, so much this. I look at the certificates issued for domains we care about & know we need a process to validate these to know in timely fashion they are genuine. We can't do that in band either. Public Key Pinning was so simple in comparison. One service per domain?!
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
That's true of earlier approaches to blockchains and particularly consensus algorithms. However we have more advanced trust models that have scaling disincentives to avoid these problems.https://youtu.be/ur1lttBXAGM
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.