@SquidDozer @Asmongold @WarcraftDevs That hasn't changed? Some things cost a buttload to run, would love to see WoL's AWS bills lol
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @SquidDozer
@SquidDozer@Asmongold@WarcraftDevs Pretty sure they aren't forcing people to pay? TSM works regardless of premium?2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BellularGaming
@BellularGaming@SquidDozer@WarcraftDevs Creating premium options creates the monetary incentive to make premium required2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Asmongold
@Asmongold@SquidDozer@WarcraftDevs I guess I dont see this as being much different to AMR and I never see fuss kicked up about it1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BellularGaming
@BellularGaming@SquidDozer@WarcraftDevs I think it creates a bad precedent and is insulting to addon devs who don't charge for their addon2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Asmongold
@Asmongold@SquidDozer@WarcraftDevs Still think there is a fundamental difference between data heavy site side stuff & regular UI addons1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BellularGaming
@Asmongold@SquidDozer@WarcraftDevs Could be the case that it's a business model allowed by a TOS gap / gap in enforcement2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BellularGaming
@BellularGaming@SquidDozer@WarcraftDevs I just don't see how there's a gap when it clearly prohibits "services related to the addon"4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@Asmongold @SquidDozer @WarcraftDevs related is a fun word. They should have an expanded clarification of what constitutes related.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.