Large reworks aren't beyond the scope of a major patch - I think it's a false premise that we're locked into everything in it's current form for 2 years. Plenty of games have implemented large system overhauls and found great success.
-
-
Who has been saying we are locked into everything in it's current form for two years though? No one at all. And imo Azerite Armor clearly doesn't need a massive overhaul anyway - like I say pretty much everyone (inc Blizz) agree what the problems are and the fixes seem obvious
4 replies 0 retweets 14 likes -
For my two cents, I totally understand why they want xpack level progression. I'd rather the HoA basically had unlockable and that you could pick a few of them - a little like War Mode talents. Add new ones to the roster, have em scale with HoA ilvl.
2 replies 0 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @BellularGaming @TaliesinEvitel and
So basically like Glyphs V2, but on your HoA. Then just leave the gear out of it and have regular heads/shoulders/chests. Perhaps there'd be room for sets there also. Just seems like a cleaner solution than the relatively complex Azerite situation.
3 replies 0 retweets 21 likes -
You see, I think that's a horrible idea Bel
And that's the problem when Blizz "Don't listen to the community"... what people usually mean is, "They are not doing the thing I want". That's a valid reason to not like a game too of course, but let's call a spade a spade :)6 replies 0 retweets 21 likes -
That's not true at all - it's about acknowledging the reason behind what people feel. That post went down so badly not because it wasn't a refutation of Azerite, but because it didn't engage with the substance of peoples disagreements.
1 reply 0 retweets 19 likes -
Lore literally agreed with two of the points and got torn apart for agreeing with them. That says to me that the community doesn't care as much about Blizz "Engaging with the substance of their disagreements" as much as people say.
3 replies 0 retweets 18 likes -
I think most of his backlash was from the two instances of fairly bad form - the false oxymoron point and the AQ40 quip. People were sad to see him acknowledge the inherent problems, likely for the same reasons that he's sad about them.
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes -
You've lost me a bit here - would we rather he DIDN'T agree with what we highlight as problems? Also shit man if someone giving a bad example of a grammatical term justifies the shit he's getting over this then we should all of us be worried
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
No, I mean that players and lore were likely on the same page in those instances. If the post had of just been that, then we'd be good. The problem was how the rest of the post came off to people. That's what set people against them.
2 replies 0 retweets 12 likes
Most of the point of my video is focused on why the post was taken in the way that it was. He really dodged the meat of the issue with traits, and set the mood poorly with the entirely incomparable AQ40 example. Basically, lots of things were done that give bad optics.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.