@TaliesinEvitel I need to see your guy’s take on this... at this point I don’t see how a positive twist can be added to BfA and how Blizz is reacting to all this. Disclaimer: am a very casual WoW player, but what Bell complains about really incorporates the problems I face
-
-
For me, the only problem I really see with the game right now is Azerite armor and the fix appears so blindingly obvious and easy that I'm honestly surprised it's still a thing. But I feel like we're at a stage where the community aren't interested in fixes, they've decided 1/2
2 replies 0 retweets 18 likes -
Replying to @TaliesinEvitel @LordFieldsworth and
2/2 they want it scrapped and anything any Blizz guy says that isn't "We're scrapping it" will be torn apart. People are tearing Lore apart for AGREEING that re-farming traits and constantly reforging gear is not fun.
6 replies 0 retweets 25 likes -
Large reworks aren't beyond the scope of a major patch - I think it's a false premise that we're locked into everything in it's current form for 2 years. Plenty of games have implemented large system overhauls and found great success.
3 replies 0 retweets 40 likes -
Who has been saying we are locked into everything in it's current form for two years though? No one at all. And imo Azerite Armor clearly doesn't need a massive overhaul anyway - like I say pretty much everyone (inc Blizz) agree what the problems are and the fixes seem obvious
4 replies 0 retweets 14 likes -
For my two cents, I totally understand why they want xpack level progression. I'd rather the HoA basically had unlockable and that you could pick a few of them - a little like War Mode talents. Add new ones to the roster, have em scale with HoA ilvl.
2 replies 0 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @BellularGaming @TaliesinEvitel and
So basically like Glyphs V2, but on your HoA. Then just leave the gear out of it and have regular heads/shoulders/chests. Perhaps there'd be room for sets there also. Just seems like a cleaner solution than the relatively complex Azerite situation.
3 replies 0 retweets 21 likes -
You see, I think that's a horrible idea Bel
And that's the problem when Blizz "Don't listen to the community"... what people usually mean is, "They are not doing the thing I want". That's a valid reason to not like a game too of course, but let's call a spade a spade :)6 replies 0 retweets 21 likes -
That's not true at all - it's about acknowledging the reason behind what people feel. That post went down so badly not because it wasn't a refutation of Azerite, but because it didn't engage with the substance of peoples disagreements.
1 reply 0 retweets 19 likes -
Lore literally agreed with two of the points and got torn apart for agreeing with them. That says to me that the community doesn't care as much about Blizz "Engaging with the substance of their disagreements" as much as people say.
3 replies 0 retweets 18 likes
So I really don't think he got torn apart for agreeing with people at all - though it would be easy to conflate that with people calling out the bad form displayed in the quip and conflation. It's easy to bundle it all in, but I think that removes all the important substance
-
-
Oh stop. No one really gives a shit about his "Bad form". It's like when when Rome "players" pretend they were upset by how their CM was rude to them. No one cares, they are just angry and want to jump on everything he says. He agreed with stuff and still got flamed for agreeing.
7 replies 0 retweets 17 likes -
I think we're at a fundamental impasse then. As for Rome 2, yeah, that situation was a crock of shit - the meme'd example was a massive edge case that the player would have to actively go out of their way to create. It is entirely narrative over substance.
2 replies 0 retweets 9 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.