Not liking the direction of a narrative because of a personal investment you have in it is not the same as a narrative being badly conceived or written. If the point was to make you go, "What? NO! Fuck you Sylvanas!" then it's done it well imo.
-
-
What’s real interesting about this is watching the tug and pull about the conversation. Same thing happened during cata “lazy writing, blizz suck ,blah blah blah. “ death wing tore the world asunder and we cried out not for the action but for how bad of a villain he was . +
-
+ we where not invested in him, there was no time put into him. He just showed up after a long sleep and bam Cata. This why a lot villains in cinema and now games fail we don’t get Invested in them, we don’t see there side, why they do the things they do+
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Where's muh scenario


Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.