And let’s not forget about the ocean acidification, the loss of coral reefs, the draining of peat bogs, melting ice caps etc.
Prikaži ovu nit
Deeply sad about Notre Dame, but shocked at the hypocrisy of humanity. We destroy over 150 acres of rainforest every minute and do not give it a second thought, yet fall into mourning at the loss of a building.pic.twitter.com/JgRkrYbQFM
-
-
-
Before the criticism starts, I’m not undermining or lessening the understandable devastation felt at the loss of an iconic building, but there are other important losses to consider and ‘rebuild’.
Prikaži ovu nit -
Whilst you’re here, please channel that drive to protect our planet into action.https://www.wwf.org.uk/thingsyoucando
Prikaži ovu nit
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
A building that probably cost the lives on many of it constructors.
-
No lives were lost.
- Još 5 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
You can care about both. And it's not "just a building" – therein lies the problem
-
Isn't that Bellas point?
- Još 5 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Could not agree more. It’s a shame about Notre Dame but it is bricks and mortar, no lives were lost and it can & will be rebuilt. Whereas time is ticking for the environment and wildlife - what a shame history is more odds priority than the future
-
Meant ‘what a shame history is more of a priority than the future’
- Još 7 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
The irony: they need to cut down 1,300 large oak trees to rebuild the Notre Dame roof in original state, they just don't know where to find these.
-
Tweet je nedostupan.
- Još 4 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.