Capitalized retirement savings/social security is near universal, even in social democracies with stronger labor power than the US. The fact that we DON’T invest social security actually makes us an outlier.
-
-
-
But elsewhere the market investment is managed largely by funds or governments themselves. The obsessive tracking of markets by retirees is very much a US phenomenon.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
And union members. There’s been a lot of great work in this area. Please read for example “The Rise of the Working-Class Shareholder” by
@DHWebber1https://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674972131 … -
yes I figured this was something academics must have thought through at length! but it hasn't made it to popular consciousness as a common idea yet I think.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
401 Ks and housing policy changes are the foundation of neoliberalism in America.
-
https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Wealth_Effect.html?id=lXuIDwAAQBAJ&source=kp_book_desc … This is a great study on how this exists around the world.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
It was a tax hack and not designed to be a durable plan for everyone. Crazy that we've formalized it instead of pensions.
-
I feel that government pensions would be one thing (isn't that the point of Social Security?) but the problem with pensions-by-company is that companies fail. A lot.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
401Ks trick people into thinking they’re rentiers when they’re really workers. They’re also terrible because markets are so volatile. Better to take 5% of gdp (which barely varies) and simply give it to old people as cash.
-
They also are terible vehicles for getting the upside of markets because they are low liquidity.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.