Buddy, that whole "Liberal democracy but with more racism" thing you're all about is a bridge to nowhere. One day you're gonna have to decide if your playboy lifestyle or your people are more important.https://twitter.com/RichardBSpencer/status/1054554111641710592 …
-
-
One of the amusing notes from that infamous debate is I figured out he wants to recreate the Holy Roman Empire without the 'Holy' part. As if huwite can stand in for any religious identity, nevermind Christianity. Better question is how delusional is this guy and what'll pop it?
-
To derail completely w/ more notes: Sargon believes his position is so right and obvious that it lends him to contempt which turns him into a dumb jackass. Was basically right with his criticisms of Spencer, but wasn't smart enough to actually know why nevermind articulate why.
-
Evola knows why, though. The love Evola gets from fascists is typically unrequited. He made it clear that he considers most fascists to be small soulled bugmen.
-
If only the interweb were good enough for a rundown of this in fifteen minutes. Suppose I'll have to dig if I find the time. Which is lacking. May have to officially embrace my hedge wizard approach and bite the bullet when names get used as short-hand refs to collective works.
-
-
Sounds excellent. On one hand, absolutism is a restatement of Christianity's view of humanity's relationship to God vis-a-vis sovereignty and first order principles of society and behavior. On the other, I hadn't quite grasped the full implications of such re modern dynamics.
-
Will probably need to listen to again. On the interesting side, herein lies the reason God says that earthly Kings are a rejection of Himself. The earthly king stands in as avatar of the divine and so appropriates God's place in the natural order. The king may see himself as...
-
beneath God, but the people see themselves as beneath a king in a fundamental and real sense. There's an appropriation of authority and power that can't be avoided in a monarchical system. In some sense, it's a failure to believe God is an active sovereign.
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
It's not even as if vices didn't exist under Christendom, it was just kept under control rather than being allowed to run wild. Vice was something people did, but weren't proud of and loudly advocated.
-
Pretty much. I don't expect someplace free of sin and vice, that's impossible (indeed, to attempt such a thing on earth is heresy). But if they can be contained and their deleterious effects minimised, that is a worthy thing to strive for.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
God. Nation. Charter. Monarchy. These are what give us meaning.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.