What they don’t say is whether any of these new firms show persistence of performance. It’s this consistency that marks out the best firms.
Great breakdown of the new Cambridge Associates post on VC value creation by @ROIChristie spoiler alert: "success is no longer limited to a handful of (often inaccessible) fund managers...new and developing fund managers consistently rank as some of the best performers." #openlphttps://twitter.com/ROIChristie/status/1220442261009453057 …
-
-
-
Indeed. Would be great to have that info
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
The Cambridge report makes a case for VC as an asset class for its clients, who are not the large limited partners like Yale. In other words, returns for large limited partners are not reflected in the Cambridge data. For large limited partner returns, Pitchbook has the best data
-
The Cambridge report is useful, but is based on data that tends to be from new venture funds due to their data coming from endowments, family offices and non-profits. Pitchbook typically gets its data from larger limited partners, who are in funds like Sequoia, Benchmark & others
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
It's what I keep telling potential LPs :)
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.