I wouldn't hesitate to say the same thing IRL
-
-
Replying to @CousinAmygdala @tekraynak
Moreover, "appraisal" is a meaningless concept and the idea that specific forms of it would respect cytoarchitectonic boundaries is specious
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @CousinAmygdala @tekraynak
Just curious - is that based on your reading of our paper or your inference from the abstract/summary image. Because that is not our view
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Neuro_Emotion @tekraynak
I'll admit it is from the abstract/summary image. But what is the point of it then if it is not illustrative?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Seriously
@CousinAmygdala, read the paper, then we'd really like to hear your critique, but it's not a simplistic view of appraisal/mapping1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Will do
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @CousinAmygdala @BecketTodd and
OK so if this true please write down the equation that equates value with "appraisal"pic.twitter.com/XDoh35wXJP
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CousinAmygdala @BecketTodd and
Alright tl;dr. I don't have it in me right now to read 33 pages of discussion arguing "appraisal" is different but the same as RL/valuation
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CousinAmygdala @BecketTodd and
I did chuckle reading about how neuroscience has ignored the "fine-grained taxonomies and sophisticated psychological models" of emotion
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
If we just said "neuroscience" we misspoke. We meant a large swath of human imaging studies, and wrt that I'll stand by that statement.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.