Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.

This is the legacy version of twitter.com. We will be shutting it down on June 1, 2020. Please switch to a supported browser, or disable the extension which masks your browser. You can see a list of supported browsers in our Help Center.

  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
BecketTodd's profile
Rebecca Todd
Rebecca Todd
Rebecca Todd
@BecketTodd

Tweets

Rebecca Todd

@BecketTodd

University of British Columbia. Tweets about neuroscience, cognitive neuroscience, psychology and sometimes bears.

Vancouver, British Columbia
mclab.psych.ubc.ca
Joined June 2012

Tweets

  • © 2020 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Holly Witteman, PhD‏ @hwitteman 10 Sep 2016
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @andpru

      WG (incl me & @KC0nn0r) agreed to have ECIs observe a cycle before reviewing. I'm sure you'll be invited to observe in March.

      3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
    2. Holly Witteman, PhD‏ @hwitteman 10 Sep 2016
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @hwitteman @andpru @KC0nn0r

      I think it's maybe overkill but honestly IMO is not worth making a fuss over. Not a bad idea to observe before jumping in.

      1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
    3. Paul Frankland‏ @Franklandlab 10 Sep 2016
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @hwitteman @andpru @KC0nn0r

      what does 'observing' involve?

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    4. Holly Witteman, PhD‏ @hwitteman 10 Sep 2016
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @Franklandlab @andpru @KC0nn0r

      As I understood, it means reading the grants & being there when they are discussed.

      2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
    5. Paul Frankland‏ @Franklandlab 10 Sep 2016
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @hwitteman @andpru

      Seems like a lot of work without being able to influence the outcome. But good to hear it's only one cycle.

      4 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
    6. Dr. Liisa Galea‏ @LiisaGalea 10 Sep 2016
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @Franklandlab @hwitteman @andpru

      there will always be a first time 2/

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    7. Holly Witteman, PhD‏ @hwitteman 10 Sep 2016
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @LiisaGalea @Franklandlab @andpru

      Sure. 1st rev will have mentorship too. IDK. Not my idea, not a fan, but don't strongly disagree either.

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
    8. Holly Witteman, PhD‏ @hwitteman 10 Sep 2016
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @hwitteman @LiisaGalea and

      And I do feel strongly that it weakens our position if we kick up a fuss about *everything*.

      6 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
    9. Andy Fraser‏ @andy_utoronto 11 Sep 2016
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @hwitteman @LiisaGalea and

      start position has to be that *everything* has to be reversed since *everything* is disastrous

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
    10. Holly Witteman, PhD‏ @hwitteman 11 Sep 2016
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @andy_utoronto @LiisaGalea and

      I don't think that view is shared by all. Old system had lots of problems for many.

      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
      Rebecca Todd‏ @BecketTodd 11 Sep 2016
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @hwitteman @andy_utoronto and

      What were main objections to old system, other than reviewer burden?

      6:45 PM - 11 Sep 2016
      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        1. New conversation
        2. Holly Witteman, PhD‏ @hwitteman 11 Sep 2016
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation
          Replying to @BecketTodd @andy_utoronto and

          30% grants shuffled around btw panels. Difficulty reviewing interdiscip apps.

          2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        3. Andy Fraser‏ @andy_utoronto 11 Sep 2016
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation
          Replying to @hwitteman @BecketTodd and

          so option A (minor tweaks) lost out to option B (destruction of Canadian science)

          0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
        4. End of conversation

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2020 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Imprint
        • Cookies
        • Ads info