-
-
-
Quite right.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Many types of sentence have long been available to courts to ensure that dangerous offenders were not automatically released. It is a lie to claim that the courts had no choice but to pass sentences that resulted in automatic release at the halfway point.
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
I can't say that this is definitely the case with Khan, but if he was anything like many of the offenders who are released on licence that I deal with then it is austerity rather than soft sentencing that will have meant that this man was not properly monitored.
-
The trial judge gave an indeterminate detention for "public protection" - apparently it was the Court of Appeal's decision that placed the public at risk.
- Još 5 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
David Merritt posted on Twitter on Saturday: “My son, Jack, who was killed in this attack, would not wish his death to be used as the pretext for more draconian sentences or for detaining people unnecessarily.”
@guardian quoted -
Such dignity! Amazing.
- Još 4 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
In despair here. I cannot recall a general election in my lifetime where outright blatant lies have been a planned election tactic. So very sad.
-
And never challenged by our media.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Going after the system rather than it’s piss poor underfunding, it’s rampant undermining, and now trying to deflect the blame I know where that Narwhal tusk needs sticking
-
That, sir, is classic!
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.