Feel free to explain who is being punished, and I can look at it when I get done tonight/tomorrow. I still think CA needs new land management personnel after these fires are out. Budget can be worked out with the new managers, who are hopefully more efficient&actually effective
-
-
Replying to @brimshae @darknaruto99
The tweet i quoted was a threat to cut funding. Clearly, rural and opposition voters for example, who had no influence on these policies should watch their houses burn down because the cities may have mismanaged their funds? (which isnt even established at this point)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Every goddamn year half of Cali burns down due to forest fires. At a certain point "things'll get even worse if you fire us!" fails to persuade.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
every god dam year Texas has a few hundred more fires Montana burns half a million more ares.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
And yet somehow this doesn't result in massive property damage, loss of life, etc.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Yeah they don't have million dollar homes burning down they have poor rural ranchers losing fields and trees. Property damage is the difference and the difference is California isn't fucking poor.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Forests and meadows grow back. Houses don't. Yes I'm shocked as well.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
So whats your solution make Californian as poor as the other states that burn more every year ?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Well how about we start by cutting down Calis eucalyptus forests and planting something there that doesn't produce flammable oil? Sound like a good idea?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
How about you not fucking destroy the ecosystem
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Eucalyptus trees are Australian you idiot. They were imported to the US about a century ago.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.