You made an explicit no true scotsman fallacy. If you want to refute that point you're going to have to specify exactly how all this mainstream feminism stuff isn't *REAL* feminism. Either that or just accept your fallacious reasoning.
-
-
Replying to @Banned_Ali @Tiffany44541244 and
Ppl who calls for the enslavement of all women in the homes of their husbands' families can call themselves feminists, it won't make it true. Just like Linda Sarsour can call herself one: Still not true. This reasoning not
#notruescotsman. Get your logical phallusies straight.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Bananaluloop @Tiffany44541244 and
Again your inability to define feminism or explain how the feminists-you-don't-like don't fit your criteria makes this the definition of a no-true-scotsman fallacy. If you're going to adhere to a cult, at least figure out what your principles are, you goof.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Banned_Ali @Tiffany44541244 and
The basic differences between true feminism and the POMO neolib BS notion of "female empowerment" promoted in the capitalist media, in about 20 minutes. Enjoy.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Bananaluloop @Banned_Ali and
Oh shit I failed to send the link in the last tweet somehow. I was in the middle of something important and got distracted. Here you go:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kUvR4388itI …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Banned_Ali @Tiffany44541244 and
You obviously don't know the meaning of the word, or understand class analysis.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Bananaluloop @Tiffany44541244 and
I do actually, which is why I can say that both strains of feminism are pseudomarxist claptrap which crudely misapply marxian class theory onto demographic/social groups and expect the analysis to be valid. "Economic oppression" tautologically follows from being an employee.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Banned_Ali @Bananaluloop and
"Gendered oppression" does not tautologically follow from having a vagina, no matter how much radfems insist it does. It's sad that I have to explain these basic concepts to you.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Banned_Ali @Tiffany44541244 and
You don't backup your assertion with any evidence or rhetoric so you have explained exactly zero.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Do you know what 'tautologically' means? You not understanding my explanation doesn't negate its existence.
-
-
Replying to @Banned_Ali @Tiffany44541244 and
You offer no evidence. It's not possible to understand an argument that hasn't been presented.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.